Wednesday, June 15, 2011

A link between climate change and Joplin tornadoes? Never.


By Bill McKibben, Published: May 23, 2011

Washington Post 

Caution: It is vitally important not to make connections. When you see pictures of rubble like this week’s shots from Joplin, Mo., you should not wonder: Is this somehow related to the tornado outbreak three weeks ago in Tuscaloosa, Ala., or the enormous outbreak a couple of weeks before that (which, together, comprised the most active April for tornadoes in U.S. history). No, that doesn’t mean a thing.
It is far better to think of these as isolated, unpredictable, discrete events. It is not advisable to try to connect them in your mind with, say, the fires burning across Texas — fires that have burned more of America at this point this year than any wildfires have in previous years. Texas, and adjoining parts of Oklahoma and New Mexico, are drier than they’ve ever been — the drought is worse than that of the Dust Bowl. But do not wonder if they’re somehow connected.
If you did wonder, you see, you would also have to wonder about whether this year’s record snowfalls and rainfalls across the Midwest — resulting in record flooding along the Mississippi — could somehow be related. And then you might find your thoughts wandering to, oh, global warming, and to the fact that climatologists have been predicting for years that as we flood the atmosphere with carbon we will also start both drying and flooding the planet, since warm air holds more water vapor than cold air.
It’s far smarter to repeat to yourself the comforting mantra that no single weather event can ever be directly tied to climate change. There have been tornadoes before, and floods — that’s the important thing. Just be careful to make sure you don’t let yourself wonder why all these record-breaking events are happening in such proximity — that is, why there have been unprecedented megafloods in Australia, New Zealand and Pakistan in the past year. Why it’s just now that the Arctic has melted for the first time in thousands of years. No, better to focus on the immediate casualties, watch the videotape from the store cameras as the shelves are blown over. Look at the news anchorman standing in his waders in the rising river as the water approaches his chest.
Because if you asked yourself what it meant that the Amazon has just come through its second hundred-year drought in the past five years, or that the pine forests across the western part of this continent have been obliterated by a beetle in the past decade — well, you might have to ask other questions. Such as: Should President Obama really just have opened a huge swath of Wyoming to new coal mining? Should Secretary of State Hillary Clinton sign a permit this summer allowing a huge new pipeline to carry oil from the tar sands of Alberta? You might also have to ask yourself: Do we have a bigger problem than $4-a-gallon gasoline?
Better to join with the U.S. House of Representatives, which voted 240 to 184 this spring to defeat a resolution saying simply that “climate change is occurring, is caused largely by human activities, and poses significant risks for public health and welfare.” Propose your own physics; ignore physics altogether. Just don’t start asking yourself whether there might be some relation among last year’s failed grain harvest from the Russian heat wave, and Queensland’s failed grain harvest from its record flood, and France’s and Germany’s current drought-related crop failures, and the death of the winter wheat crop in Texas, and the inability of Midwestern farmers to get corn planted in their sodden fields. Surely the record food prices are just freak outliers, not signs of anything systemic.
It’s very important to stay calm. If you got upset about any of this, you might forget how important it is not to disrupt the record profits of our fossil fuel companies. If worst ever did come to worst, it’s reassuring to remember what the U.S. Chamber of Commerce told the Environmental Protection Agency in a recent filing: that there’s no need to worry because “populations can acclimatize to warmer climates via a range of behavioral, physiological, and technological adaptations.” I’m pretty sure that’s what residents are telling themselves in Joplin today.
Bill McKibben is founder of the global climate campaign 350.org and a distinguished scholar at Middlebury College in Vermont.

Living Routes--Study Abroad in Ecovillages

Here's an idea whose time has come--s study abroad experience in an ecovillage via the Study Abroad Program hosted by UMass Amherst. Choices include Australia, India, Brazil, Israel, Peru, Costa Rica, Mexico, and Scotland. And of course, you can experience an ecovillage in the USA.

The University of Massachusetts at Amherst puts it this way:

Bring your education to life by studying in communities across the globe that are striving to live more equitable, just and sustainable lifestyles. These communities are ideal campuses to learn about and experience personal and community-based solutions to real world issues, which include:

Sustainable development
Environmental studies & research
Appropriate technologies
Consensus decision making
Peace and social justice
Worldviews and consciousness
Permaculture & ecological design
Organic agriculture
Fair trade
Local economies
Green building
Habitat restoration
Women's empowerment
Bioregional studies




Through rich, academic, interdisciplinary coursework, service learning, cultural studies and community immersions, Living Routes programs support you in developing the understanding, skills, and experience necessary to help restore your life, community and the planet to greater health and resiliency while preparing for a career that makes a difference."

For more information on ecovillages and the experiences others have had there, just go to Living Routes at http://livingroutes.org

Saturday, June 4, 2011

Who's a Climate Scientist? I'm a Climate Scientist!


Australian climate scientists, tired of opinions on climate change generated by people who are clearly NOT climate scientists, decided to take their message to the people. Here's their rap on what climate scientists with an edge might say. Below are the words to the rap:
In the media landscape there are climate CHANGE deniers and BELIEVERS, but rarely those speaking about climate change are actual climate scientists.
yo....we're climate scientists.. and there's no denying this Climate Change Is REEEEALL..
Who's a climate scientist..
I'm a climate scientist..
Not a cleo finalist
No a climate scientist
Droppin facts all over this wax
While bidness be crying about a carbon tax
Climate change is caused by people
Earth Unlike Alien Has no sequel
We gotta move fast or we'll be forsaken,
Cause we were too busy suckin things Copenhagen: (Politician)
I said Burn! it's hot in here..
32% more carbon in the atmosphere.
Oh Eee Ohh Eee oh wee ice ice ice
Raisin' sea levels twice by twice
We're scientists, what we speak is True.
Unlike Andrew Bolt our work is Peer Reviewed... ooohhh
Who's a climate scientist..
I'm a climate scientist..
An Anglican revivalist
No a climate scientist
Feedback is like climate change on crack
The permafrosts subtracts: feedback
Methane release wack : feedback..
Write a letter then burn it: feedback
Denialists deny this in your dreams
Coz climate change means greater extremes,
Heat won't be the norm
Heatwaves bigger badder storms
The Green house effect is just a theory sucker (Alan Jones)
Yeah so is gravity float away muther floater
Who's a climate scientist..
I'm a climate scientist..
I'm not a climate Scientist
Who's Climate Scientists
A Penny Farthing Cyclist
No
A Fox News Journalist?
No
A Paleontologist?
No
A Clean Coal Lobbyist?
No
A Cashed up Alarmist?
No! a climate scientist! Yo! Preach!
Written and performed by Climate Scientists, Dan Ilic, Duncan Elms and production by Brendan Woithe at Colony NoFi.

Monday, May 16, 2011

Rex Tillerson at the Davos Annual Meeting, 2007, “The New Era of Petropolitics”,


Notable quotes:
" By undermining U.S. competitiveness, they would discourage future investments in energy projects in the United States and therefore undercut job creation and economic growth"--Rex Tillerson, CEO, Exxon Corporation

Thursday, April 7, 2011

Is Humankind Evolving Into A Global Superorganism?


Is humankind evolving into a superorganism? Australian scientist, environmentalist, author, and climate change activist Tim Flannery thinks so.

In this short video (embedded), and in his latest book Here on Earth, Flannery argues that we are living in a immensely cooperative world, rather than in a survival-of-the-fittest, dog-eat-dog world.

Flannery explains that we are not so dissimilar to ant colonies. These consist of individuals knitted so tightly together they represent an organism. The glue that holds us together is our division of labor and our civilization of common beliefs and ideas. We have evolved from villages ten thousand years ago into being on the verge of becoming a global superorganism, a global community.

He points out that the recent and ongoing revolutions in north Africa are the latest development of the spread of shared ideas and beliefs leading to a global community. He says this has positive implications for our goal of global environmental sustainability.

Flannery maintains that humankind will become a regulating intelligence for the planet. We will help create coordination and stability between the parts of Earth’s troubled systems. Learning to regulate Earth’s climate and stabalize our own population are major examples of this.

What are your thoughts? Do you think this is happening? Is this where we are heading as a species?

Monday, March 21, 2011